Can Conference Proceedings Be Purblished Again on a Journal
This post discusses whether it is is advisable to publish a conference paper as a journal commodity or volume chapter.
The post was prompted by a word I had with one of my brightest students, which might resonate with your experience. She had recently presented at a conference, and —having received positive feedback— was considering submitting her paper to a journal. She felt, rightly, that this would be benign to her career, because journal articles tend to be more highly-regarded than conference contributions, and because she felt that having more than publications in her CV would add to her brownie every bit a fledgling scholar. Withal, she was witting that using the aforementioned enquiry twice felt like gaming the arrangement, and she wanted to know if it is really OK to submit.
The short answer to this question is 'yes'. In linguistic communication education, and in many other disciplines, it is quite common for journal articles to begin their life equally conference presentations (and if you curl all the way to the bottom of this post, y'all tin can find out more than about how to expand a conference paper to a journal article).But before yous do any of that, there are iii things that you should consider.
Does the new paper infringe copyright?
Many academic conferences nowadays have their proceedings published, even if the 'proceedings' only exist every bit a .pdf file that lives briefly online at the conference website. When this happens, copyright of the papers that are included in the proceedings commonly passes from the author(s) to the conference organisers. Sometimes, transfer of copyright is formally acknowledged in a signed document, but even if that is not the case, copyright is tacitly transferred when you hold to have a newspaper published (in some cases, local law may permit the writer to reserve some rights, only allow'southward not go into any of that).
Reproducing material that has already been published (over again, this includes electronic and non-commercial publications) would exist a violation of the publishers' copyright, and could —at least in theory— have legal consequences. In practise, briefing organisers are normally happy to grant you lot permission to re-use your content, in commutation for an acknowledgement by the author that the newspaper was first presented at their conference. However, permission must be requested, rather than assumed, and organisers are well within their rights to refuse. Another matter to consider is that conference organisers are ofttimes difficult to attain after the end of the conference, and responding to your queries might not be an immediate priority for them. In such cases, too, the text cannot be re-used verbatim.
Information technology is possible to rephrase the content of a briefing presentation in a way that would avoid copyright infringement. Different disciplines and dissimilar countries accept different rules almost this. Some of the rules-of-thumb I have come across while researching this mail range from having less than 10% textual overlap to having at least 30% new content. Only really, what y'all should be doing is exercising common sense in interpreting whatever guideline applies. For instance, overlap caused by shared quotations or information extracts is less of a problem; multiple identical paragraphs, on the other hand, might be problematic, fifty-fifty if they account for less than x% of the total text. Schematics and tables cannot be paraphrased, and may therefore prove somewhat challenging, but re-using them judiciously and with advisable citation might exist considered 'fair use' depending on local law.
Does the new newspaper deceive readers?
(Photo by Amtec Photos | CC Past-SA)
The second issue to consider is bookish honesty. The main trouble here is self-plagiarism, i.e., re-publishing a text y'all wrote in the past, and passing information technology off as something new. Unlike actual plagiarism, self-plagiarism does not involve 'stealing' words or ideas, but information technology is still an act of bookish deception. Readers, who may spend money and fourth dimension to access an author'south work, do so because they implicitly look that they have never read this piece of work before, and self-plagiarism violates their trust (How would you feel if you bought a detective novel, only to notice that it had the aforementioned plot every bit the author's previous work, along with identical chunks of text?).
Another reason why so-called 'duplicate' publications are problematic is that they can misconstrue the scholarly tape. This is because they brand information technology unclear that two or more papers (i.due east., the conference presentation and the subsequent paper) refer to the same study. Readers might be left with the impression that the findings of the periodical commodity confirm those reported in the briefing, when in fact it is the same dataset that is being described twice. In some disciplines, most notably medicine, such distortion could have serious consequences if, for instance, the same dataset were to exist included several times in a meta-assay that draws on multiple articles. In language education, and probably most of the Humanities and Social Sciences too, implications are usually not quite so dire. Still, distorting the scholarly tape is taken seriously, and it leads to article retractions, which are very public and very embarrassing for everyone involved.
To deal with these risks, what you need to do is to be very clear that the commodity stems from a previous conference contribution, and do this consistently in all the stages of the publication procedure. A mutual way to prove the origin of the article is by inserting a footnote or endnote somewhere in the text (eastward.g.,"The findings reported in this article were originally presented at…."). Information technology is also good exercise to draw the journal editor's attention to the previous publication, and explicate what —if any— changes have been made. This allows them to brand their ain decision virtually whether the newspaper merits farther consideration, plus they can often offering helpful suggestions about how to deal with the situation.
Does the new newspaper add value to the scholarly tape?
Expanded, more fully adult, or more than refined versions of a conference newspaper add value to the scholarly tape.
(Photo by Mikes Photos on Pexels.com)
A final thing to consider when thinking nigh publishing a presentation every bit a journal commodity is whether the new publication adds to the torso of scholarly knowledge. Sometimes (but not very often), it may actually be useful to re-publish a conference newspaper every bit a journal article with no changes at all. This may be the case with obscure or regional conferences, or conferences that just publish their proceedings in a limited number of print volumes. In such a case, an argument could exist made that the new publication helps to make the findings available to a wider readership, although institutional and disciplinary repositories are usually a better culling (Here'south a list of such repositories, in example you're interested).
A far more compelling argument in favour of a new publication can be made when the periodical commodity is an expanded, more fully developed, or more refined version of the conference paper. At minimum, the text will take to exist adjusted to meet the needs of the journal'south readership, and any changes that highlight different aspects of the study may be of scholarly value. Some other thing to remember is that briefing papers tend to be shorter and more than focused than journal manufactures. For instance, when presenting at a conference, we sometimes avert lengthy literature reviews, bold that the audience volition exist familiar with the state-of-the-art. Also, the time limit of a conference presentation means that we we often have to be selective about how much data nosotros can present. A periodical article could accost these shortcomings by presenting a fuller argument in proper context. Finally, information technology is quite mutual for our thinking to develop in response to the give-and-take that the conference paper generated. Journal articles that grow out of conference presentations (rather than only repeat the aforementioned content) are a welcome addition to the literature.
In summary…
Coming back to the original question: Provided the new submission passes the tests of legality , ethics and value , it is perfectly fine to publish a conference presentation as an commodity.
Earlier yous go: If you landed on this page because you lot're planning to write an article, I hope that you found this post helpful and I wish yous all the best with your publishing endeavours.
For some ideas about preparing a conference paper for publication, you may want to have a look at this editorial, by Jeff Offutt, the editor of the Periodical of Software Testing, Verification and Reliability.
If yous have more questions, feel gratuitous to drop a line in the comments below, or ask me using this contact form. There's also a range of social sharing buttons below, in case you experience like sharing this information with anyone else who might find it useful.
Source: https://achilleaskostoulas.com/2014/01/11/can-i-publish-a-conference-paper-in-a-journal/
0 Response to "Can Conference Proceedings Be Purblished Again on a Journal"
Post a Comment